Author Topic: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872  (Read 2992 times)

Offline crazyroosterman

  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,558
  • Cluck.
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #15 on: June 05, 2015, 05:33:06 pm »
well this topic got wonderfully derailed wasn't this topic meant to be something to do with engineering originally?
c.r

Offline Mick

  • Hero Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #16 on: June 05, 2015, 05:36:06 pm »
well this topic got wonderfully derailed wasn't this topic meant to be something to do with engineering originally?

Partially. I meant to to be about build openers and initial technology pacing in general.

Offline crazyroosterman

  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,558
  • Cluck.
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #17 on: June 05, 2015, 05:42:07 pm »
and then it turned it turned into a critique of ptarths typing style by kasnavada awesome perhaps you should rename this how to type correctly. (disclaimer I'm joking don't bite my head of please)
c.r

Offline kasnavada

  • Hero Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 986
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #18 on: June 05, 2015, 05:44:20 pm »
[img width= height= alt=funny gifs]http://gifs.gifbin.com/102014/1414429357_camel_bites_man.gif[/img]

This thread has reached the point where anything I'm saying is not read.

Let's go further into off topic =).
« Last Edit: June 05, 2015, 05:47:49 pm by kasnavada »

Offline kasnavada

  • Hero Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 986
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #19 on: June 05, 2015, 05:48:27 pm »
Hey, maybe it'll make him laugh =).

Offline Cinth

  • Core Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,527
  • Resident Zombie
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #20 on: June 05, 2015, 05:58:11 pm »
Let's just not take it all personally.  We all want the game to do well, so let's focus on that. 
Quote from: keith.lamothe
Opened your save. My computer wept. Switched to the ST planet and ship icons filled my screen, so I zoomed out. Game told me that it _was_ totally zoomed out. You could seriously walk from one end of the inner grav well to the other without getting your feet cold.

Offline crazyroosterman

  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,558
  • Cluck.
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #21 on: June 05, 2015, 06:01:53 pm »
maybe so but it might just make him hate us even more than he currently does all he wants is good feed back and then he get utter nonsense like this I would not be surprised to see him post an angry raving topic over this. (for those who are wondering I am joking)
« Last Edit: June 05, 2015, 06:13:17 pm by crazyroosterman »
c.r

Offline Cinth

  • Core Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,527
  • Resident Zombie
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #22 on: June 05, 2015, 06:09:07 pm »
maybe so but it might just make him hate us even more than he currently does all he wants is good feed back and then he get utter nonsense like this I would not be surprised to see him post an angry raving topic over this.

I kinda doubt it, I think we've managed to settle ourselves down a bit from where it was headed.
Quote from: keith.lamothe
Opened your save. My computer wept. Switched to the ST planet and ship icons filled my screen, so I zoomed out. Game told me that it _was_ totally zoomed out. You could seriously walk from one end of the inner grav well to the other without getting your feet cold.

Offline crazyroosterman

  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,558
  • Cluck.
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #23 on: June 05, 2015, 06:12:22 pm »
maybe so but it might just make him hate us even more than he currently does all he wants is good feed back and then he get utter nonsense like this I would not be surprised to see him post an angry raving topic over this.

I kinda doubt it, I think we've managed to settle ourselves down a bit from where it was headed.
you do know I was joking right?..............ps its obvious that Chris won't hate us because kasnavada wonderful camel clip will make it obvious that there's no animosity here.
c.r

Offline Cinth

  • Core Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,527
  • Resident Zombie
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #24 on: June 05, 2015, 06:53:03 pm »
Sarcasm doesn't translate well into written english.  ::)

Try tagging with /s   ;)
Quote from: keith.lamothe
Opened your save. My computer wept. Switched to the ST planet and ship icons filled my screen, so I zoomed out. Game told me that it _was_ totally zoomed out. You could seriously walk from one end of the inner grav well to the other without getting your feet cold.

Offline Mick

  • Hero Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #25 on: June 05, 2015, 07:08:10 pm »
When someone uses a sarcasm tag, I feel like they are insulting my ability to recognize sarcasm. Either that, or they are bad at sarcasm and need the crutch. It's like telling a joke, and explaining immediately afterward why the joke is funny.

Sarcasm is an art, use it cautiously and know your audience.

Offline Cinth

  • Core Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,527
  • Resident Zombie
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #26 on: June 05, 2015, 07:42:43 pm »
When someone uses a sarcasm tag, I feel like they are insulting my ability to recognize sarcasm. Either that, or they are bad at sarcasm and need the crutch. It's like telling a joke, and explaining immediately afterward why the joke is funny.

Sarcasm is an art, use it cautiously and know your audience.

Heh, I win some and lose some  :)  It didn't necessarily need a tag, just something that actually says it isn't serious. 
Quote from: keith.lamothe
Opened your save. My computer wept. Switched to the ST planet and ship icons filled my screen, so I zoomed out. Game told me that it _was_ totally zoomed out. You could seriously walk from one end of the inner grav well to the other without getting your feet cold.

Offline crazyroosterman

  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,558
  • Cluck.
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #27 on: June 05, 2015, 07:47:38 pm »
I have to admit I wasn't even aware I was being sarcastic (or at least be interpreted as being sarcastic) in till you pointed that out id rather not put disclaimers on every single joke I try to make or else ill start turning into ptarth 0_0
c.r

Offline Cinth

  • Core Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,527
  • Resident Zombie
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #28 on: June 05, 2015, 07:51:10 pm »
ill start turning into ptarth 0_0

LOL   :D

There's a row of yellow circles with stuff in the center that helps color your posts without an actual disclaimer  ::)
Quote from: keith.lamothe
Opened your save. My computer wept. Switched to the ST planet and ship icons filled my screen, so I zoomed out. Game told me that it _was_ totally zoomed out. You could seriously walk from one end of the inner grav well to the other without getting your feet cold.

Offline ptarth

  • Arcen Volunteer
  • Hero Member Mark III
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,166
  • I'm probably joking.
Re: Engineering Building and Technology Pacing Issues- .872
« Reply #29 on: June 05, 2015, 08:41:57 pm »
Years of experience on the internet has lead me to the final conclusion that I should not try to be funny. Not that I'm not funny, I am. I know I'm funny.
But there is always 1+ individuals who will not see it that way. And that 1+ individual is going to comment on it.

As an example, look at poor Chris, every other post he makes is covering PR bases. It is even starting to creep into the Mantis.
Note: This post contains content that is meant to be whimsical. Any belittlement or trivialization of complex issues is only intended to lighten the mood and does not reflect upon the merit of those positions.