« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Down

Author Topic: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)  (Read 11451 times)

Offline Mánagarmr

  • Core Member Mark V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,272
  • if (isInRange(target)) { kill(target); }
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #60 on: July 11, 2012, 12:37:05 pm »
I seem to remember Eyebots getting a work-over in one of those earlier polls. Am I dreaming?
Logged
Click here to get started with Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports.

Thank you for contributing to making the game better!

Offline Hearteater

  • Core Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,334
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #61 on: July 11, 2012, 01:06:23 pm »
I believe so.  They were pushed heavily, but they ultimately didn't get changed.  Their combat numbers are actually just fine, it really is a usability issue more than anything else.
Logged

Offline PokerChen

  • Hero Member Mark III
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,088
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #62 on: July 12, 2012, 02:21:27 am »
Quote from: Wingflier on July 11, 2012, 11:27:35 am
What do you guys think about the Tachyon Microfighters?  To me they just seem like glorified fighters, the "Tachyon" effect is basically insignificant. 

http://www.arcengames.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=Tachyon_Microfighter

I think it would be cool if we made their Tachyon Range something massive (increasing by level) to make them useful.

Don't just take my word for it, take some for a test drive. :P In many games, there is this niche problem of locating Stealth Guardposts that don't like to come out in the open. A flock of micro-fighters will fix that up pretty good.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5]   Go Up
« previous next »