So, we have a player on the Steam forums who won on Triple Hard. That in and of itself might not be a problem, but his strategy seemed like cheese. Here are their comments:
My strategy was to set both sides to Greek, and build nothing but Incense, Steel and Clay. Instead of troops, I just drop Minotaurs on everything and build towns to be destroyed. Worked great!
So... ideas on how to prevent this?
Hi Tigersfan,
quick question, but do we 'have' to stop this kind of thing? I mean the guy that is doing this 'knows' what he is doing, he is cheesing, and he is then blaming the game? I mean if we wall up all the 'cheese-able' tactics, then what? Can you or me play as casual players and still have the game just not roll over us?
I really am starting to think this whole 'We Have To Stop Cheese!' is the wrong way to look at this. If the guy wants to in effect cheat, then he knows it. But changing the game to much for these kinds of guys and these kinds of tactics is just taking the game out of reach for casual and low to medium ability players.
That is my opinion of course,
-Teal
Well, one thing I've noticed with this sort of thing is this:
It's true that some players might do that sort of tactic and know "Yeah, I'm cheating.... and I dont care, I can play how I want". But, all too often, this is not actually the case. You might get a new player, who tries something like that, thinking it's a totally valid, non-cheat tactic.... because how are they to know better? .... and then decides "Well, this is boring.... all you have to do in this game is use mountains! And here I thought this game was going to be good!", and then goes around bad-mouthing the game all over the place, saying that it's "shallow" and stuff like that.
This sort of thing can be seen not just with strategy titles, but with basically every genre. To me, it's one of the core reasons why stopping "cheese" tactics is important, and making sure that the game in question is balanced. I've watched it happen too many times, and it's never a good thing.