General Category > Private Alpha Discussion

Economic preferences

<< < (2/2)

keith.lamothe:

--- Quote from: x4000 on January 08, 2018, 08:23:17 am ---If "Ark One" is the baseline, and we have Rorqual and some of the others that are basically different from the baseline in some way other than just visually (we promised that to the backers)
--- End quote ---
Looking at the reward sidebar and the main-body-image description of Arkitect, I only see visual stuff.

That said, if a stat request is easily granted within the existing xml framework (which covers a lot of stuff) I'm happy to go beyond what was promised.



--- Quote ---BUT, we've also had a request from folks to be able to choose the visuals they want and then have a playstyle that they want.
--- End quote ---
It's very easy to mod ArkOne (or a copy of it) to have different visuals. If desired we can have the end of the Ark dropdown list just be a bunch of "(Visual Only) Rorqual", etc options. There would need to be two entity definitions for each variant (with-stat-changes and without) but that's not a problem.



--- Quote ---Or one of the more complex ones like Turtle, and it basically kills the engines of whatever Ark they choose, etc.
--- End quote ---
Turtle would actually use a different entity type, probably, so that the Ark behavior is handled entirely in xml and there's no special-case C# code for "this unit's engines are not only dead, they cannot be repaired" (those kinds of exceptions pile up leaning-tower-of-pisa style). If someone wanted a Turtle with a different Ark's visuals it's a 5-minute copy-and-paste in the xml.



--- Quote ---By having two sets of dials there, the underlying personality of each Ark is maintained, but players are able to have a further level of customization via this economic preferences thing.  Which sounds like it goes well beyond the economy, frankly.
--- End quote ---
Bear in mind that stuff like Turtle or Shadow may not go into the base game because it may not be feasible to balance them or keep them balanced. Making variants is easy, keeping all variants equally playable ranges from hard to impossible :)

As it is, the economic variants would probably disable achievements (the straight-bonus ones certainly would) by way of indicating that it's more of a playing preference than a finely-balanced option. +science is always going to be pretty killer regardless of which resource you give up for it, etc.

x4000:
That all makes good sense, thanks.  Good point on the promises to backers; that said, I'm just making copies of the Ark One in xml (via the duplicate) and then assigning the new visuals and letting us then do diffs as needed.  So as you say, having visual and non-visual variants would not be a big deal.

Potentially keeping them all visual-only would be best for balance, we can see what those folks think.

Draco18s:
Allowing the mechanical and visual to be chosen separately is a good idea, though I'd advocate for picking a style and having that style's mechanics be default (and listed) unless the player chooses a different mechanical layout.

It keeps the thematic pairing, but allows for a quick alteration if desired.

I'd leave XML adjustment to a player wanting to make that optional choice more permanent.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page