Author Topic: Aurora  (Read 8316 times)

Offline eRe4s3r

  • Core Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,825
Re: Aurora
« Reply #30 on: January 03, 2012, 05:15:52 pm »
Well you are of course right.. its his hobby and he codes the thing.. so yeah.. it just makes me sad to see something so potentially monumental being driven into a solid brick wall

MSDN even clearly says that all VB6 applications should convert to .Net and if he alone doesn't want to do that he could open source it (what has he got to lose if its his hobby?)
Proud member of the Initiative for Bigger Weapons EV. - Bringer of Additive Blended Doom - Vote for Lore, get free cookie

Offline Cyborg

  • Master Member Mark III
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,957
Re: Aurora
« Reply #31 on: January 03, 2012, 07:07:23 pm »
The reason Microsoft wants you to convert this is to drive sales, mostly. Secondly, for compatibility. Thirdly, it makes functions more secure against buffer overflow attacks. I bet the author cares little for these things, especially if the scope of the product has changed. It goes back to that issue I was talking about. All the design documents in the world are not going to help you when it comes down to changing the product itself because the audience changes or the purpose changes. There is a finite amount of time in this world, so you can't make everything hyper-flexible. "Well you should have done that in the design document" is tantamount to saying, "You should've thought of that beforehand." Just as helpful, too.

If Aurora amounts to sales, I'm sure it will change his mind, but I doubt he is going to chase after an unknown foreign audience.
Kahuna strategy guide:
http://www.arcengames.com/forums/index.php/topic,13369.0.html

Suggestions, bugs? Don't be lazy, give back:
http://www.arcengames.com/mantisbt/

Planetcracker. Believe it.

The stigma of hunger. http://wayw.re/Vi12BK

Offline Cydonia

  • Jr. Member Mark III
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: Aurora
« Reply #32 on: January 03, 2012, 10:39:22 pm »
Thanks for this game. I already saw some familiar names on the aurora-forum like Echo and deMangler.

I hope I can get into this game, of course without substracting time from AI War!!!  ;)
Germany, timezone +1

Thank you for chosing Value-Rep!

Offline deMangler

  • Full Member Mark II
  • ***
  • Posts: 189
  • om tare tuttare ture soha
Re: Aurora
« Reply #33 on: January 04, 2012, 09:46:32 am »
While browsing the Aurora forum, I found this post

http://aurora2.pentarch.org/index.php/topic,2187.0.html

Which seems to be the devs response to the 'Why VB?' thing.

I thought I would share it here as it is a good post, and also I feel a bit responsible for the thread diversion into the pros and cons of VB, but really every case is unique and the Aurora devs view is the one that counts in this case....

There ya go anyway.

:)

Offline Echo35

  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,703
  • More turrets! MORE TURRETS!
Re: Aurora
« Reply #34 on: February 03, 2012, 04:54:29 pm »
Thanks for this game. I already saw some familiar names on the aurora-forum like Echo and deMangler.

I hope I can get into this game, of course without substracting time from AI War!!!  ;)

Yeah, used to post on there a good bit, but I haven't played it in a while :)