Author Topic: Tank Balance Revisited  (Read 1267 times)

Offline Spikey00

  • Lord of just 5 Colony Ships
  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,704
  • And he sayeth to sea worm, thou shalt wriggle
Tank Balance Revisited
« on: December 27, 2009, 04:18:52 pm »
Tank Balance - Revisited
I feel that Tanks are still somewhat unbalanced--now few units are able to hit them, as intended, but they don't have a hard counter anymore.  Observing a group of my units (including Tanks), they took far too long in destroying enemy Tanks, and I would like to see a few changes to them, yet again.

I believe a change could be tested on:
- Increasing unit HP but keeping shields at same value (or have them be incremented per tech, 20 000 => 25 000 => 30 000),
- Frigates (missiles) bonus against Tanks (negating shields).


The bonus shouldn't be too great--perhaps ~20 shots to destroy one tank for a T1 Frigate.
I'd take a sea worm any time over a hundred emotionless spinning carriers.
irc.appliedirc.com / #aiwar
AI War Facebook
AI War Steam Group

Offline I-KP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 681
  • Caveat Pactor
Re: Tank Balance Revisited
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2009, 05:23:24 pm »
Maybe not give Frigates the boost vs Tanks as that only recreates the problem they started off with: too slow and never reach a target.  You don't want to give the best long range Fleet ship the bonus vs Tanks.  Make Bombers the good stuff vs Tanks; makes sense logically as Bombers are meant to be the best vs fields/shields.
Atmospheric & Lithospheric Reticulator,
Post-accretion Protoplanet Aesthetic Seeding Team,
Celestial Body Design & Procurement Division,
Magrathea Pan-Galactic Planets Corp.,
Magrathea.

Offline Spikey00

  • Lord of just 5 Colony Ships
  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,704
  • And he sayeth to sea worm, thou shalt wriggle
Re: Tank Balance Revisited
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2009, 05:31:56 pm »
Whichever works--my initial ideology was mostly due to the idea of missile penetration of the shields.
I'd take a sea worm any time over a hundred emotionless spinning carriers.
irc.appliedirc.com / #aiwar
AI War Facebook
AI War Steam Group

Offline Vaos

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Tank Balance Revisited
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2009, 07:13:39 pm »
Bombers have a pretty good range at mk III/IV/Core (more than 4k!), so this could be a problem, just changing the distance where they die from 7k to 4+k.

Maybe you could make melee units very potent against them? But having one of the basic units strong against them seems pretty important or else the AI would stomp you with those.

Offline Spikey00

  • Lord of just 5 Colony Ships
  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,704
  • And he sayeth to sea worm, thou shalt wriggle
Re: Tank Balance Revisited
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2009, 07:26:48 pm »
Quite a dilemma for that idea--Tanks are geared for up-close combat, but melee is too; the melee ship would have to come in range, and therefore the Tank would be able to bear arms upon it.  Melee ignores shields, though...
I'd take a sea worm any time over a hundred emotionless spinning carriers.
irc.appliedirc.com / #aiwar
AI War Facebook
AI War Steam Group

Offline Vaos

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 107
Re: Tank Balance Revisited
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2009, 07:42:29 pm »
Melee ignores shields, though...

That's why melee units make sense as a counter. A little more resistance from the melee units to tank fire and it may work out.

Offline x4000

  • Chris McElligott Park, Arcen Founder and Lead Dev
  • Arcen Staff
  • Zenith Council Member Mark III
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,651
Re: Tank Balance Revisited
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2010, 08:48:19 pm »
Thanks are really meant to be very slow and powerful against most short and middle-range ships in particular.  I am pretty happy with the balance overall, this is what makes them a bit more of a unique ship.  There are counters, but if they have too strong of a "hard counter" they won't feel very tank-ish, right?
Have ideas or bug reports for one of our games?  Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports. Thanks for helping to make our games better!

Offline Spikey00

  • Lord of just 5 Colony Ships
  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,704
  • And he sayeth to sea worm, thou shalt wriggle
Re: Tank Balance Revisited
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2010, 11:26:19 am »
I was thinking about this, and I generally agreed with your statement--however, I will need to do some testing to see if long-ranged ships are better against them.
I'd take a sea worm any time over a hundred emotionless spinning carriers.
irc.appliedirc.com / #aiwar
AI War Facebook
AI War Steam Group