Author Topic: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver  (Read 14568 times)

Offline KDR_11k

  • Hero Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 904
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #90 on: November 30, 2012, 05:01:57 am »
Is the idea another bonus ship or a base ship? Because if it's just a bonus ship infiltrators do the job just fine.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2012, 05:08:52 am by KDR_11k »

Offline keith.lamothe

  • Arcen Games Staff
  • Arcen Staff
  • Zenith Council Member Mark III
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,505
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #91 on: November 30, 2012, 10:05:38 am »
@Keith (I know you're watching just letting us hash it out):
Actually just aiming the OMD while you're all concentrated.

Quote
What would the difficulty codewise be of swapping OMD's to a different set of stats based on minor faction selection?  Basically, I'm thinking of a different OMD being seeded should a superweapon faction be selected.
Stat swapping is a last-resort sort of thing (did it for golems and only for a few stats), but we could have an "alter ego OMD" new ship type that gets seeded instead of the normal one, and it could have different stats or shoot plaid rainbows or whatever.
Have ideas or bug reports for one of our games? Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports. Thanks for helping to make our games better!

Offline chemical_art

  • Core Member Mark IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Fabulous
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #92 on: November 30, 2012, 10:53:38 am »
If we wanted an OMD that was different depending on minor factions, why not stick with the OP and get a multiplier against ultra heavy?

It wouldn't hurt starships any more, but hit the very minor factions that need the boost in damage.

The only difference would be moving some (or all) of the champion hulls to ultra-heavy if champions wanted more damage. The battleship, at least, could be moved to ultra heavy.
Life is short. Have fun.

Offline chemical_art

  • Core Member Mark IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Fabulous
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #93 on: November 30, 2012, 10:57:29 am »
Is the idea another bonus ship or a base ship? Because if it's just a bonus ship infiltrators do the job just fine.

We could go crazy.

You know the targetting logic on the penetrator, where it only fires if directly commanded?

Give that logic to scouts (or call them a new name), and give them a weak, armor piercing shot that pierces shields and only gets a bonus to ultra-heavy and structural. It would mostly chip the paint, but for MK III scouts you might be able to chip away 5% or 10% or so of an OMD per cap.

It's meant as a weak last resort, but on the side provide motivation to get some III's for anything but for scouting.
« Last Edit: November 30, 2012, 11:02:55 am by chemical_art »
Life is short. Have fun.

Offline Burnstreet

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 129
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #94 on: November 30, 2012, 01:43:15 pm »
@Keith (I know you're watching just letting us hash it out):
Actually just aiming the OMD while you're all concentrated.

Quote
What would the difficulty codewise be of swapping OMD's to a different set of stats based on minor faction selection?  Basically, I'm thinking of a different OMD being seeded should a superweapon faction be selected.
Stat swapping is a last-resort sort of thing (did it for golems and only for a few stats), but we could have an "alter ego OMD" new ship type that gets seeded instead of the normal one, and it could have different stats or shoot plaid rainbows or whatever.
Please! I want an Orbital Rainbow Driver!  :) :) :) ;) :D ;D :o 8)

Offline Mánagarmr

  • Core Member Mark V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,272
  • if (isInRange(target)) { kill(target); }
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #95 on: November 30, 2012, 02:08:20 pm »
AI War: Friendship is Magic?
Click here to get started with Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports.

Thank you for contributing to making the game better!

Offline Kahuna

  • Core Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,222
  • Kahuna Matata!
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #96 on: November 30, 2012, 03:00:46 pm »
AI War: Friendship is Magic?
AI War: AI Makes a Peace
AI War: AI Falls In Love
AI War: AI Becomes a Father
AI War: AI Buys a Pony
AI War: Teenage Mad Bomber AIs
set /A diff=10
if %diff%==max (
   set /A me=:)
) else (
   set /A me=SadPanda
)
echo Check out my AI War strategy guide and find your inner Super Cat!
echo 2592 hours of AI War and counting!
echo Kahuna matata!

Offline KDR_11k

  • Hero Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 904
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #97 on: November 30, 2012, 03:15:12 pm »
AI War: Teenage Mad Bomber AIs

Now we need a variant of the Turtle AI called the Ninja Turtle...

Offline keith.lamothe

  • Arcen Games Staff
  • Arcen Staff
  • Zenith Council Member Mark III
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,505
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #98 on: November 30, 2012, 03:18:20 pm »
AI War: Teenage Mad Bomber AIs

Now we need a variant of the Turtle AI called the Ninja Turtle...
A turtle with a ton of etherjets in its special forces and threatfleet might do an excellent imitation ;)
Have ideas or bug reports for one of our games? Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports. Thanks for helping to make our games better!

Offline Histidine

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #99 on: November 30, 2012, 08:45:48 pm »
Hunter/Killer Love/Tolerance Bus

Offline Fluffiest

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #100 on: December 01, 2012, 11:07:49 am »
I was thinking Hugger/Kisser, actually.

Back on track. Why don't the "Raider" bonus fleetships have forcefield immunity? They look like they really want to be a fleet version of the Raid Starship, but they're missing its most important feature (also, they have mine immunity which the Starship lacks).

Can anyone think of a fleetship with Black Hole Machine immunity?

Offline KDR_11k

  • Hero Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 904
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #101 on: December 01, 2012, 12:30:24 pm »
I guess Raiders don't ignore FFs because that's the job of Infiltrators.

Offline Kahuna

  • Core Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,222
  • Kahuna Matata!
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #102 on: December 01, 2012, 01:12:04 pm »
I guess Raiders don't ignore FFs because that's the job of Infiltrators.
Infiltrators shouldn't ignore FFs because that's the job of Eye Bots.
Eye Bots shouldn't ignore FFs because that's the job of melee ships.
Melee ships shouldn't ignore FFs because that's the job of Raid Starships.
set /A diff=10
if %diff%==max (
   set /A me=:)
) else (
   set /A me=SadPanda
)
echo Check out my AI War strategy guide and find your inner Super Cat!
echo 2592 hours of AI War and counting!
echo Kahuna matata!

Offline chemical_art

  • Core Member Mark IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Fabulous
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #103 on: December 01, 2012, 04:26:22 pm »
I guess Raiders don't ignore FFs because that's the job of Infiltrators.
Infiltrators shouldn't ignore FFs because that's the job of Eye Bots.
Eye Bots shouldn't ignore FFs because that's the job of melee ships.
Melee ships shouldn't ignore FFs because that's the job of Raid Starships.

Because raiding = shield piercing, right?
Life is short. Have fun.

Offline KDR_11k

  • Hero Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 904
Re: Proposed update for the Orbital Mass Driver
« Reply #104 on: December 02, 2012, 05:12:38 am »
I guess Raiders don't ignore FFs because that's the job of Infiltrators.
Infiltrators shouldn't ignore FFs because that's the job of Eye Bots.
Eye Bots shouldn't ignore FFs because that's the job of melee ships.
Melee ships shouldn't ignore FFs because that's the job of Raid Starships.

Infils and Raiders are both swarmer fleet ships for different raiding scenarios. Also melee only ignores FFs because it wouldn't work properly otherwise.

The Raider might need a buff considering its tractor immunity isn't all that interesting especially when the Infil can just bypass tractors by staying cloaked. Mine immunity doesn't do all that much when dealing with the AI either. Converging the raider and infiltrator into the same ship probably isn't the right approach though.