Author Topic: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)  (Read 11476 times)

Offline chemical_art

  • Core Member Mark IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Fabulous
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #15 on: July 09, 2012, 11:11:00 am »
commandos don't fulfill their role, but at least they don't die faster then the other younglings now (although still being pricy)
Life is short. Have fun.

Offline Varone

  • Jr. Member Mark III
  • **
  • Posts: 96
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #16 on: July 09, 2012, 11:55:45 am »
I don't know about anyone else but the Zenith starship and the Spire starship just seem too costly knowledge wise and just don't seem that impressive for the human players. I never ever research these ships as i would rather spend the knowledge on a MK III fleet ship or two instead. I would rather get the damage boost from more ships than a very costly starship that doesn't do much damage really.

Offline TechSY730

  • Core Member Mark V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,570
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #17 on: July 09, 2012, 12:49:01 pm »
I don't know about anyone else but the Zenith starship and the Spire starship just seem too costly knowledge wise and just don't seem that impressive for the human players. I never ever research these ships as i would rather spend the knowledge on a MK III fleet ship or two instead. I would rather get the damage boost from more ships than a very costly starship that doesn't do much damage really.

Yea, I would agree that their "rebalance" sort of nerfed them rather than helped them. In fact, as I have mentioned many times before, K costs for military starships are too high in general compared to fleet ships. I'd say, either rebalance the military starships overall (using the plasma seige and the raid starships as guidelines for good Mk. I starship usability), and review their knowledge costs for Mk. II and Mk. III versions.

As for the Zenith and Spire starships, I don't really think they can be truly fixed until they are split into their own lines (aka, a fleet starship line, a zenith starship line, and a spire starship line) which can be balanced individually and be given their own "personality", sort of like what they had before, but not locked to higher tiers (and thus higher knowledge costs)


EDIT: In fact, can I nominate military starships (with the previously mentioned exceptions of plasma seige and raid) overall? And also nominate all military Mk. II (except for fleet ship Mk. II) and Mk. III military starships?

Offline chemical_art

  • Core Member Mark IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Fabulous
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #18 on: July 09, 2012, 01:52:20 pm »
I'm onboard for for the military starship line
Life is short. Have fun.

Offline TechSY730

  • Core Member Mark V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,570
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #19 on: July 09, 2012, 02:05:42 pm »
I'm onboard for for the military starship line

Which one? The fleet starship line? Or a balance pass for all of the military starships?

Offline Wanderer

  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,579
  • If you're not drunk you're doing it wrong.
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #20 on: July 09, 2012, 02:44:43 pm »
Alright, now that I'm concious again, I'll have to vote for Armor Rotter and Infiltrators.  I fear up-voting infiltrators though.  I've seen what they can do to defenses in the AI's hands, even if they're crap for the player as a raider.  Simply giving them a speed boost, though, would be enough I think for player improvement without over-balancing them to the AI.

I'd still like to see Zenith Caches get a once over for the price of popping them.
... and then we'll have cake.

Offline chemical_art

  • Core Member Mark IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Fabulous
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #21 on: July 09, 2012, 02:59:14 pm »
I'm onboard for for the military starship line

Which one? The fleet starship line? Or a balance pass for all of the military starships?

fleet starships are the only one that stands out. Aside from maybe a 2x structural bonus for the bomber, I think the rest are fine. Raiders raid well, siege guns are like siege weapons, cloaking ships are good, enclaves are good.
Life is short. Have fun.

Offline TechSY730

  • Core Member Mark V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,570
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #22 on: July 09, 2012, 03:04:09 pm »
Ok, then, let me summarize my nominations so far (my rational and suggested changes have already been stated by myself, or if it hasn't, assume my rational is the same others gave)

Spire armor rotters
Armor boosters
Captive Human Settlements
Fleet Starship lines (mostly the upper levels)
Mk. II and beyond military starships (mostly the knowledge costs)
Zenith Caches
Teleport Raiders
Tachyon drone (the one you don't have to unlock)

and weak nominations for:
ether-jet tractors
Decloaker drone (the one you have to unlock) (terra-bad HP mostly)
« Last Edit: July 09, 2012, 03:06:24 pm by TechSY730 »

Offline Wingflier

  • Core Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,753
  • To add me on Steam, click the little Steam icon ^
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #23 on: July 09, 2012, 03:36:19 pm »
If teleport raiders are to be considered, than regular raiders definitely need to be considered, as they are inferior to their teleporting cousins in just about every way and also inferior to similar ships of the same role.
"Inner peace is the void of expectation. It is the absence of our shared desperation to feel a certain way."

Offline Wanderer

  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,579
  • If you're not drunk you're doing it wrong.
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #24 on: July 09, 2012, 03:38:32 pm »
If teleport raiders are to be considered, than regular raiders definitely need to be considered, as they are inferior to their teleporting cousins in just about every way and also inferior to similar ships of the same role.

Raiders cloak and don't have half of the things you want to raid immune to their ammo.  I'm afraid I have to disagree with that, it's not an apples to apples comparison.
... and then we'll have cake.

Offline Wingflier

  • Core Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,753
  • To add me on Steam, click the little Steam icon ^
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #25 on: July 09, 2012, 03:43:56 pm »
If teleport raiders are to be considered, than regular raiders definitely need to be considered, as they are inferior to their teleporting cousins in just about every way and also inferior to similar ships of the same role.

Raiders cloak and don't have half of the things you want to raid immune to their ammo.  I'm afraid I have to disagree with that, it's not an apples to apples comparison.
Raiders don't cloak, check your facts. They don't have bonuses against anything you would want to raid. Space planes do more damage, are faster, have cloaking AND radar dampening. No self respecting player would use raiders on any difficulty past 8 with so many superior options.
"Inner peace is the void of expectation. It is the absence of our shared desperation to feel a certain way."

Offline TechSY730

  • Core Member Mark V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,570
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #26 on: July 09, 2012, 04:08:17 pm »
If teleport raiders are to be considered, than regular raiders definitely need to be considered, as they are inferior to their teleporting cousins in just about every way and also inferior to similar ships of the same role.

Raiders cloak and don't have half of the things you want to raid immune to their ammo.  I'm afraid I have to disagree with that, it's not an apples to apples comparison.
Raiders don't cloak, check your facts. They don't have bonuses against anything you would want to raid. Space planes do more damage, are faster, have cloaking AND radar dampening. No self respecting player would use raiders on any difficulty past 8 with so many superior options.

I would nominate raiders too, except I have never used them, and I have never seen the AI use them, so I can't reasonably nominate them. If this is true though, it sounds like they deserve a nomination from someone who has used them.

Offline Kahuna

  • Core Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,222
  • Kahuna Matata!
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #27 on: July 09, 2012, 04:32:27 pm »
Worthless ships IMO (for humans(from the worst to the.. not the worst? ???)):
Armor Rotter
Grenade Launcher
Eye Bot
Impulse Reaction Emitter
Deflector Drone
Zenith Electric
Zenith Chameleon
Raptor
Autocannon
Raiders
« Last Edit: July 09, 2012, 04:38:56 pm by Kahuna »
set /A diff=10
if %diff%==max (
   set /A me=:)
) else (
   set /A me=SadPanda
)
echo Check out my AI War strategy guide and find your inner Super Cat!
echo 2592 hours of AI War and counting!
echo Kahuna matata!

Offline Wanderer

  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,579
  • If you're not drunk you're doing it wrong.
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #28 on: July 09, 2012, 04:35:23 pm »
Raiders don't cloak, check your facts. They don't have bonuses against anything you would want to raid. Space planes do more damage, are faster, have cloaking AND radar dampening. No self respecting player would use raiders on any difficulty past 8 with so many superior options.

*Holds up hands*  Sorry, you're right.  I had Autocannons on the brain.  Apologies.
... and then we'll have cake.

Offline keith.lamothe

  • Arcen Games Staff
  • Arcen Staff
  • Zenith Council Member Mark III
  • *****
  • Posts: 19,505
Re: Nominations for Worst Ship Ever (VI)
« Reply #29 on: July 09, 2012, 04:40:03 pm »
Ah yes, those autocannons are sneaky like that.
Have ideas or bug reports for one of our games? Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports. Thanks for helping to make our games better!