« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8   Go Down

Author Topic: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?  (Read 19236 times)

Offline Martyn van Buren

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 642
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #90 on: August 01, 2012, 12:33:08 pm »
It would be preposterously OP if the Mk III logistics station gave all human fleet ships teleportation, right?
Logged

Offline chemical_art

  • Core Member Mark IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Fabulous
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #91 on: August 01, 2012, 12:44:31 pm »
Quote from: Martyn van Buren on August 01, 2012, 12:33:08 pm
It would be preposterously OP if the Mk III logistics station gave all human fleet ships teleportation, right?

It would completely nullify the zenith space time manipulator.
Logged
Life is short. Have fun.

Offline Martyn van Buren

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 642
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #92 on: August 01, 2012, 12:45:24 pm »
Oh that is true and should not be done.
Logged

Offline KDR_11k

  • Hero Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 904
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #93 on: August 01, 2012, 02:03:56 pm »
Isn't the bigger problem Log II? Log III has the benefit of denying teleportation to the AI but Log II adds nothing to the logistics function of the station IIRC. So besides a small increase in resource output there's no real benefit to Mk II.
Logged

Offline Martyn van Buren

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 642
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #94 on: August 01, 2012, 02:09:24 pm »
Any reason logistics shouldn't just have only two marks?
Logged

Offline TechSY730

  • Core Member Mark V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,570
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #95 on: August 01, 2012, 03:11:30 pm »
Quote from: Martyn van Buren on August 01, 2012, 02:09:24 pm
Any reason logistics shouldn't just have only two marks?

Well, it would break the symmetry thing we have going among the three basic command station types.


I would like to see some sort of increased speed reduction of enemy units as the Mk goes up. Kieth, you mentioned how the "what is the max speed I can have considering outside effects?" code is in a performance crititical loop, but how hard would it be to change it from (speedSoFor >> 1) to something like (speedSoFar >> 1) - N or (speedSoFar - N) >> 1? (Where N is 0 in most cases, but for Mk. II and up logistics stations, it would be higher) This would introduce issues with underflow and speeds being put at 0, which may require additional bounds checks, which you might not be able to afford in that code path.

If this sort of thing would not work, how about giving logistics stations Mk. II and up a gravity effect? That would require some balancing to figure out what good ranges and magnitudes for those gravity effects would be though.
Logged

Offline Wingflier

  • Core Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,753
  • To add me on Steam, click the little Steam icon ^
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #96 on: August 01, 2012, 03:19:27 pm »
What if MKIIs stopped teleportation within a certain radius of themselves?  That's kind of a good compromise.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2012, 03:38:52 pm by Wingflier »
Logged
"Inner peace is the void of expectation. It is the absence of our shared desperation to feel a certain way."

Offline Kahuna

  • Core Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,222
  • Kahuna Matata!
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #97 on: August 01, 2012, 03:27:20 pm »
Quote from: TechSY730 on August 01, 2012, 03:11:30 pm
Quote from: Martyn van Buren on August 01, 2012, 02:09:24 pm
Any reason logistics shouldn't just have only two marks?

Well, it would break the symmetry thing we have going among the three basic command station types.


I would like to see some sort of increased speed reduction of enemy units as the Mk goes up. Kieth, you mentioned how the "what is the max speed I can have considering outside effects?" code is in a performance crititical loop, but how hard would it be to change it from (speedSoFor >> 1) to something like (speedSoFar >> 1) - N or (speedSoFar - N) >> 1? (Where N is 0 in most cases, but for Mk. II and up logistics stations, it would be higher) This would introduce issues with underflow and speeds being put at 0, which may require additional bounds checks, which you might not be able to afford in that code path.

If this sort of thing would not work, how about giving logistics stations Mk. II and up a gravity effect? That would require some balancing to figure out what good ranges and magnitudes for those gravity effects would be though.
MarkI = Gravitional Turret with MarkII Military Stations range
MarkII = Logistics Command Station atm
MarkIII = GravDrill without movement speed penalty for friendly ships AND WITH a big movement speed boost for friendly ships
BOOM! Problem solved!
« Last Edit: August 01, 2012, 03:47:37 pm by Kahuna »
Logged
set /A diff=10
if %diff%==max (
   set /A me=:)
) else (
   set /A me=SadPanda
)
echo Check out my AI War strategy guide and find your inner Super Cat!
echo 2592 hours of AI War and counting!
echo Kahuna matata!

Offline Wingflier

  • Core Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,753
  • To add me on Steam, click the little Steam icon ^
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #98 on: August 01, 2012, 03:36:29 pm »
That would make MK3s way too powerful.  It would be impossible for the AI to ever assault your planet successfully.
Logged
"Inner peace is the void of expectation. It is the absence of our shared desperation to feel a certain way."

Offline Martyn van Buren

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 642
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #99 on: August 01, 2012, 03:46:41 pm »
I am definitely against nerfing the current Mk I; it is in step with the other kinds for usefulness
Logged

Offline PokerChen

  • Hero Member Mark III
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,088
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #100 on: August 02, 2012, 02:03:39 am »
If the economic command station is named the logistics command station, I would suggest giving it a supply range of 2 planets instead of the usual 1 planet. Then the current logistics station can be named zenith ST station. :P
Logged

Offline Coppermantis

  • Hero Member Mark III
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,212
  • Avenger? I hardly know 'er!
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #101 on: August 02, 2012, 02:18:41 am »
Quote from: zharmad on August 02, 2012, 02:03:39 am
If the economic command station is named the logistics command station, I would suggest giving it a supply range of 2 planets instead of the usual 1 planet. Then the current logistics station can be named zenith ST station. :P

That's actually a very interesting idea. Giving one of the command stations an increased supply reach would be a feature I would support.
Logged
I can already tell this is going to be a roller coaster ride of disappointment.

Offline Kahuna

  • Core Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,222
  • Kahuna Matata!
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #102 on: August 02, 2012, 02:58:09 am »
Quote from: zharmad on August 02, 2012, 02:03:39 am
If the economic command station is named the logistics command station, I would suggest giving it a supply range of 2 planets instead of the usual 1 planet.
Yay! My turrets would work even if the CS gets destroyed! I like this idea.
Logged
set /A diff=10
if %diff%==max (
   set /A me=:)
) else (
   set /A me=SadPanda
)
echo Check out my AI War strategy guide and find your inner Super Cat!
echo 2592 hours of AI War and counting!
echo Kahuna matata!

Offline PokerChen

  • Hero Member Mark III
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,088
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #103 on: August 02, 2012, 08:10:17 am »
A mantis issue has been created correspondiong to this increased supply radius idea. :D
Logged

Offline KDR_11k

  • Hero Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 904
Re: Do harvester upgrades now dominate econ command stations?
« Reply #104 on: August 02, 2012, 04:16:30 pm »
How about letting the MkII logistics block a wormhole when placed next to it, i.e. while the station is up no AI unit can pass through that wormhole from this side (entering the system is possible, just not leaving so you can get in to attack the station but not out).
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8   Go Up
« previous next »