« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?  (Read 1700 times)

Offline Mánagarmr

  • Core Member Mark V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,272
  • if (isInRange(target)) { kill(target); }
Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?
« on: December 06, 2010, 07:27:21 pm »
Am I the only one that feels this way? The AI had a blob of some 400 ships sitting on a wormhole, drooling at the prospect of owning me, when I sent a full cap  MK I lightning warheads (biggest range) through and blew them up in their faces.

Now, I remember from back in the days that a lightning missile essentially put a HOLE on that blob. Not so much this time, these four missiles took a part of the ships down to roughly 30% health. That's it. A full cap of missiles and it did...that.

Is that really the intention? It makes missiles look a bit weak, really.
Logged
Click here to get started with Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports.

Thank you for contributing to making the game better!

Offline x4000

  • Chris McElligott Park, Arcen Founder and Lead Dev
  • Arcen Staff
  • Zenith Council Member Mark III
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,651
Re: Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2010, 07:28:32 pm »
Note that the old lightning warheads are the new mark III ones.  Hence the weaker stats on the mark I ones.  IIRC.
Logged
Have ideas or bug reports for one of our games?  Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports. Thanks for helping to make our games better!

Offline Mánagarmr

  • Core Member Mark V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,272
  • if (isInRange(target)) { kill(target); }
Re: Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2010, 07:29:46 pm »
Ah, yeah well that would explain the damage loss, but the MK III also have an extremely short range in that they essentially can hit two-three ships at tops, so I'm kinda reluctant to use them :/. In fact, even the Mk I range is a bit short.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2010, 07:34:17 pm by Moonshine Fox »
Logged
Click here to get started with Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports.

Thank you for contributing to making the game better!

Offline Lancefighter

  • Core Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,440
Re: Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2010, 07:42:12 pm »
mk2 are the old lightning turrets - 250k damage at 1k range

mk3 are more 'i really want to blow up that ship'.. less area effect.

What you really want are martyrs >.>
Logged
Ideas? Suggestions? Concerns? Bugs to be squashed? Report them on the Mantis Bugtracker!

Author of the Dyson Project and the Spire Gambit

Offline x4000

  • Chris McElligott Park, Arcen Founder and Lead Dev
  • Arcen Staff
  • Zenith Council Member Mark III
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,651
Re: Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2010, 07:47:04 pm »
Ah, that's right -- thanks Lance.
Logged
Have ideas or bug reports for one of our games?  Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports. Thanks for helping to make our games better!

Offline Mánagarmr

  • Core Member Mark V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,272
  • if (isInRange(target)) { kill(target); }
Re: Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2010, 01:10:55 pm »
Okay, so my understanding is that "this is intended, this is the way it's supposed to be and we have no intention of buffing them, because it's not needed". Am I right in assuming this?

Personally, I feel they are a bit on the weak side when even a full cap of warheads can't knock out a single ship :/
Logged
Click here to get started with Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports.

Thank you for contributing to making the game better!

Offline zebramatt

  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,574
Re: Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2010, 01:46:37 pm »
I'm inclined to agree.

Although I understand that they're not supposed to be an obvious choice for the player to use, at present the MkIs at least are a very obvious choice not to - they basically do nothing!
« Last Edit: December 07, 2010, 02:08:38 pm by zebramatt »
Logged

Offline Mánagarmr

  • Core Member Mark V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,272
  • if (isInRange(target)) { kill(target); }
Re: Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?
« Reply #7 on: December 07, 2010, 01:51:48 pm »
I'm glad someone agrees. I thought I was going completely nutty. I'm Mantising this, for better tracking and visibility.
Logged
Click here to get started with Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports.

Thank you for contributing to making the game better!

Offline PineappleSam

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?
« Reply #8 on: December 07, 2010, 01:54:22 pm »
How do lightning missiles compare to Spire Martyrs damage wise?
Logged

Offline Mánagarmr

  • Core Member Mark V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,272
  • if (isInRange(target)) { kill(target); }
Re: Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?
« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2010, 02:04:08 pm »
Logged
Click here to get started with Mantis for Suggestions and Bug Reports.

Thank you for contributing to making the game better!

Offline Suzera

  • Full Member Mark III
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
Re: Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?
« Reply #10 on: December 07, 2010, 03:18:52 pm »
Permanent disadvantage, temporary gain (sometimes not even that).
Logged

Offline lanstro

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
Re: Missiles (Lightning) underpowered?
« Reply #11 on: December 07, 2010, 07:46:25 pm »
Mk IIIs aren't that great at killing a single high value target either - I remember one game several weeks back when we tried to use two of them to take down a clump of spire starships (we were fighting a starship commander) and they barely scratched them: the damage couldn't punch through the spires' armour
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »