Author Topic: Crafting duplicate spellgems  (Read 2132 times)

Offline syndicatedragon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Crafting duplicate spellgems
« on: September 26, 2011, 02:03:45 pm »
Is there any benefit to crafting multiple spellgems? I accidentally crafted something that I had already made. Does it make that spell more powerful, or did I just waste my components?

Offline tigersfan

  • Arcen Games Contractor
  • Arcen Staff
  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,599
Re: Crafting duplicate spellgems
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2011, 02:06:20 pm »
Sorry, there isn't any advantage to this. But, gems are fairly easy to come by.

Also, about every 5 levels or so, you can find higher tiered gems, for example, in in level 5 area, you might find a Jade II instead of a Jade I. The higher tiered gems DO make for more powerfull spells.

Offline syndicatedragon

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Crafting duplicate spellgems
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2011, 02:14:09 pm »
It would be really nice if the game would warn you if you were crafting something already in your inventory.

Offline tigersfan

  • Arcen Games Contractor
  • Arcen Staff
  • Master Member Mark II
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,599
Re: Crafting duplicate spellgems
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2011, 02:18:48 pm »
It would be really nice if the game would warn you if you were crafting something already in your inventory.

Noted, I'll add that suggestion into Mantis. Thanks for your feedback!

Offline Admiral

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 547
Re: Crafting duplicate spellgems
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2011, 04:04:39 pm »

Noted, I'll add that suggestion into Mantis. Thanks for your feedback!

It's already in there (from me):

http://www.arcengames.com/mantisbt/view.php?id=3970


Offline Nalgas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 680
Re: Crafting duplicate spellgems
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2011, 06:08:52 pm »
Voted up with extreme prejudice.  That was one of those things that was supposed to be included in the new crafting interface but hasn't quite made it in yet.  It's otherwise in pretty good shape compared to its original form, though.